Rethinking the Use of Electronic Health Records for Decision-Making in Health Services Management: A Concept Paper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66066/6ktc3516Keywords:
Electronic Health Records, Burden-Value Shift Model, Health Services Management, Technology Acceptance Model, Feedback LoopAbstract
Despite the widespread use of Electronic Health Records across the healthcare industry, collecting massive amounts of data from patients, the promise of strategic data efficacy is yet to be fully unlocked. If anything, the process of gathering data is more of a burden to healthcare workers and hospitals due to the high costs of data collection, healthcare worker burnout and poor job satisfaction. The focus on data management is to meet regulatory requirements more than creating strategic value. Simultaneously, data is quickly becoming the next currency of power after land and money. Those with massive amounts of data stored, as well as the means to extract predictive insights from it have a significant advantage in the future. Therefore, with the current perception around data management as a burden in healthcare settings, the potential for biopower in strategic decision-making is underutilized. To change this, I propose a conceptual framework called the Burden-Value Shift Model (BVSM), where I apply TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) principles of PEOU (perceived ease of use) and PU (perceived usefulness) to a data governance framework of four keys pillars (data collection, data processing, data analysis and strategic feedback). With the right approach to collect, store and utilize data, the benefits materialized will not only be economic to the healthcare organizations, but behavioral and sociological as well. Healthcare workers will gain motivation while appreciating value of the work they do by seeing their actions transform into tangible outcomes. Additionally, patients themselves who are the primary data generators, will benefit from solutions extracted from the data. The key is to ensure that improvements are done across the board through enhancing both technology and human well-being. Examples include investing in automation to reduce human effort, creating trust through verification of data sources, extracting useful insights for better patient care and lower costs, while simultaneously providing feedback to healthcare employees creates a continuous positive loop across all pillars within the ecosystem. The ensuing principle emanating from BVSM in this case is that when the perceived as well as real effort to collect and utilize data on a micro level is low but the value high, it is likely to create a sustainable and efficient system with high utility on a macro level. The proposed framework links small actions of a nurse or healthcare manager clicking a data point to a larger impact across society.
References
Abramson, D. (2023, December 11). The Future of Healthcare Analytics Relies on FHIR Data | Qrvey. Qrvey. https://qrvey.com/blog/the-future-of-healthcare-analytics-relies-on-fhir-data/
Ajami, S., & BagheriTadi, T. (2013). Barriers for Adopting Electronic Health Records (EHRs) by Physicians. Acta Informatica Medica, 21(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2013.21.129-134
American Hospital Association. (2017). Regulatory Overload Assessing the Regulatory Burden on Health Systems, Hospitals and Post-acute Care Providers. https://www.aha.org/system/files/2018-02/regulatory-overload-report.pdf
Ashuri, T., & Roanne van Voorst. (2024). Networked biopower: personalized healthcare in a datafied world. Information Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2442411
Bender, D., & Sartipi, K. (2013). HL7 FHIR: An Agile and RESTful approach to healthcare information exchange. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/cbms.2013.6627810
Blumenthal, D. (2009). Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(15), 1477–1479. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp0901592
Cresswell, K., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(5), e73–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Duncan, J. (2023). Data protection beyond data rights: governing data production through collective intermediaries. Internet Policy Review, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.3.1722
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). Vintage Books.
Gesner, E., Dykes, P. C., Zhang, L., & Gazarian, P. (2022). Documentation Burden in Nursing and Its Role in Clinician Burnout Syndrome. Applied Clinical Informatics, 13(05), 983–990. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757157
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
Hussain, A., Zhiqiang, M., Li, M., Jameel, A., Kanwel, S., Ahmad, S., & Ge, B. (2025). The mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on nurses’ intentions to adopt advanced technology. BMC Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02648-8
Joukes, E., Ameen Abu-Hanna, Cornet, R., & Keizer, N. de. (2018). Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record. Applied Clinical Informatics, 09(01), 046–053. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1615747
Kaplan, B. (2001). Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism. Int J Med Inform, 64(1):39-56.
Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (2000). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press.
Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428
Melnick, E. R., Sinsky, C. A., & Krumholz, H. M. (2021). Implementing Measurement Science for Electronic Health Record Use. JAMA, 325(21), 2149–2149. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.5487
Meyer, A. D., & Goes, J. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923. https://doi.org/10.2307/256344
Olakotan, O., Samuriwo, R., Ismaila, H., & Atiku, S. (2025). Usability Challenges in Electronic Health Records: Impact on Documentation Burden and Clinical Workflow: A Scoping Review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70189
Ronen, H. C. (2024). How Can Compliance Be a Strategic Advantage for Behavioral Health Practices. Ronan Health Consulting Blog.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006). Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepcerta132
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Assessing the fit between technology and the structure of organizations: A model of technology implementation. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wipfler, R. S., et al. (2023). EHR-Integrated Patient-Generated Health Data and Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 173, 105085.
Zheng, K., Padman, R., Johnson, M. P., & Diamond, H. S. (2009). An Interface-driven Analysis of User Interactions with an Electronic Health Records System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m2852
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Public Health Review Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.